Many desktops

All questions related to installations, configurations and maintenance of Advanced Host Monitor (including additional tools such as RMA for Windows, RMA Manager, Web Servie, RCC).
Post Reply
m0n
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 3:15 am

Many desktops

Post by m0n »

Hello,

is it possible to use AHM to check if 15000 desktops are up & running ?
If so, how ?

Thx,

m0n
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

What about simple Ping test method?

Regards
Alex
m0n
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 3:15 am

Post by m0n »

but ping test is not enough really to see if they are up & working for the users
hamoja
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 6:00 pm

Post by hamoja »

You really need to be more specific as to what want monitored or define "working". Ping test is the only test that checks up/down status for PC comminucation to the network.
FLynch
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: London UK

Post by FLynch »

How about basic monitors on;

Ping test
CPU
Memory
Disk space

.....for each workstation? However 15,000 * 4 monitors would be a hell of a lot for any system to poll, collate and report on.
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

Yeah. If m0n wants to check 4 parameters of each system every 5 min, 15000*4/60/5 = 200 checks per second. HostMonitor will not start so many threads. But it will be possible to check each system every 10 min... if network is good.

Anyway, I agree with hamoja - m0n should be more specific. We don't know what exactly he wants to monitor. May be all systems located in the same network, or may be he wants to monitor hundreds of networks all over the world...

Regards
Alex
User avatar
Marcus
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 6:00 pm

Post by Marcus »

My checks would be:
Ping and "lanmanworkstation" service with the ping test as the master. :D

The biggest performance problems are dependent on your reporting. We see that when a lot of tests change status, sometimes reporting will boost cpu usage to 100%
m0n
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 3:15 am

Post by m0n »

Oki thx, ill just monitor the servers instead of all desktops

;)

m0n
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

The biggest performance problems are dependent on your reporting. We see that when a lot of tests change status, sometimes reporting will boost cpu usage to 100%
You are generating reports using "Generate reports" action? Probably you can setup HostMonitor to create reports by timer (e.g. every 3 min)?

Regards
Alex
User avatar
Marcus
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 6:00 pm

Post by Marcus »

Probably you can setup HostMonitor to create reports by timer
Which we do, but also for every status change. Which will generate a lot of reports with (for example) network failures :D
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

H'm... don't see good solution that can resolve this problem.
On the one hand we can implement some reports pool and create report after 1-3 sec delay - create single report for all requests that come within this time interval.
On the other hand it can effect action profiles behavior... E.g. when action profile should create report and then send report by mail

Regards
Alex
Post Reply