"cron jobs" (scheduling tests at absolute time)

Need new test, action, option? Post request here.
Post Reply
rs4u
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:45 pm

"cron jobs" (scheduling tests at absolute time)

Post by rs4u »

Please: Whoever has (or sees) a need for cron job - like tasks back this wish up.
KS says:
KS-Soft wrote:We have such task in "to do" list. It has low priority because we think most users do not need such option.
If we are wrong, please post your opinion into "Wish list" forum. Use this forum what something does not work.

Regards
Alex
Hi,

for instance when testing if a cron job ran successfully one needs tests to have ran at a defined time, like a cron job in *nix or "at" in Windows. The procedure KS advises is very unpracticable.
It is really a pain to define such schedules for timetables that could be so easy. Whereas it might work that way it is inconvinient and illogical and therefor error prone to define a test running each full hour with hundreds of clicks and entries.
How would I fine tune a test that runs each full hour ? 0 * * * * run test took 16x24 (= 384!!!!) settings going the KS-way.
How would I fine tune a test that runs 00/10/20/30/40/50 per hour? 0,10,20,0,40,50 * * * * run test took 6x16x24 (= 2304!!!!) settings going the KS-way.
Just to define ONE single schedule!


*nix provides a well-tried way to define such absolute schedules and I wanted the same in HostMon.


Thank you, Rainer
rs4u
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:45 pm

Post by rs4u »

...this could IMHO be pretty quick and easy be implemented by enhancing the "irregular schedule".
First step could be to simply add "start test one time per day" and "start test one time per hour" which would satisfy 90+ % of the cases such a 'cron test' is needed.

If you changed from RadioButton-list to dropdown-box(es) there even was enough space on the existing panel to define two such tests (lets say each hour at 00 + each hour at 30)

What do you think,Alex?

Regards, Rainer
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

We have such tasks in our "to do" list. Low priority.
If other people vote for this option, I will increase task priority.

Regards
Alex
Igorek
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Russia

Post by Igorek »

I vote
User avatar
dareusz
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:14 am
Location: Poland

vote yes

Post by dareusz »

Vote YES!
It's good idea.
Jeroen
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:27 am

I vote YES too!!

Post by Jeroen »

I would be a great help for me too
rs4u
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:45 pm

Post by rs4u »

Alex,

these are 4 poeple now out of the few users that use to post.
How many would we have to be to have our wish realized?

Have a great day, Rainer
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

I have increased task priority to "medium"

Regards
Alex
rs4u
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:45 pm

Post by rs4u »

thanks, Alex!

It REALLY was great to have!


Rainer
daseymour
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:36 am

Post by daseymour »

KS-Soft wrote:I have increased task priority to "medium"

Regards
Alex
Thank you... this feature will substantially benefit the agency I work for.
Post Reply