Search found 6 matches
- Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:59 pm
- Forum: Configuration, Maintenance, Troubleshooting
- Topic: Must "No answer" always = "Bad"?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20274
- Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:12 pm
- Forum: Configuration, Maintenance, Troubleshooting
- Topic: Must "No answer" always = "Bad"?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20274
Alex, I tried it with simply the expression ('%Reply%'>20) I tested it at less than 20 messages and got a Good status. Then I logged in with The Bat and tied up the mailbox with a Dispatch, and received a bad status, but without an Alert. Once again, that's what I wanted. Finally, I logged out of th...
- Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:27 pm
- Forum: Configuration, Maintenance, Troubleshooting
- Topic: Must "No answer" always = "Bad"?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20274
- Mon Feb 16, 2004 11:34 am
- Forum: Configuration, Maintenance, Troubleshooting
- Topic: Must "No answer" always = "Bad"?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20274
- Sat Feb 14, 2004 1:15 am
- Forum: Configuration, Maintenance, Troubleshooting
- Topic: Must "No answer" always = "Bad"?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20274
Thanks for the fast reply, Alex. I tried that but I can't tell if it worked. I'll experiment with it some more. Meanwhile, I am wondering if I could skip the repeat test by using the StatusID to exclude No Answer from the condition, i.e.: ('%SimpleStatus%'=='DOWN') and ('%StatusID%'<>02) Is that an ...
- Fri Feb 13, 2004 1:25 pm
- Forum: Configuration, Maintenance, Troubleshooting
- Topic: Must "No answer" always = "Bad"?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20274
Must "No answer" always = "Bad"?
Forgive me if this has been answered here or in the Help file. I monitor just one specific POP3 account and perform two separate tests: message count and total file size. I do them separately so that it sends me a different e-mail depending on which parameter has been exceeded. Obviously, it cannot ...