| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gdvl
Joined: 04 Apr 2002
Posts: 103
Location: Belgium
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 11:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Problem (example):
We use an external test for a file-count in a (spool)folder. To ignore peak-moments, we use a "consecutive bad results" of 2 for the alert actions. (the test interval is 5 min)When there is a bad status, and 5 min. later, it's ok again, the good-status alerts are fired! (which I won't)
This wasn't a problem in 1,x, cause the retry-count was on the test itself, not on the alert actions.
Is there a way to solve this ?
Thus: only a good-status alert when there was a bad-status alert.
I hope I'm clear.
Gdvl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know about this problem, will be fixed in next version.
Regards
Alex
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gdvl
Joined: 04 Apr 2002
Posts: 103
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2002 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alex,
Am I right if I mean this problem isn't solved in v3.10?
Regards,
Gdvl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2002 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You are right.
I am working with this problem right now.
Regards
Alex
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Done. Please, try version 3.12 http://www.ks-soft.net/download/hm312.zip
Now each "good" action has new option "Action depends on 'bad' one".
Regards
Alex
[ This Message was edited by: KS-Soft on 2002-04-23 12:51 ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gdvl
Joined: 04 Apr 2002
Posts: 103
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2002 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alex,
It works, except when the dependency bad action was fired (thus, when the bad count was exceed for that action). From that time, the good action is fired again ALWAYS(after a bad status).
(It seems there is a flag which is not reset after the good status alert was fired)
Regards,
Gdvl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gdvl
Joined: 04 Apr 2002
Posts: 103
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2002 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alex,
I tested v3.12 for 2 days, with almost 200 tests, and everything looks fine (for me). The dependency alert actions are ok now.
It's also a very good thing that you can modify mastertests on a multi-select.
Regards,
Gdvl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2002 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for testing. On Monday new version will be on site.
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in
