my setting: HM6.51c on XP SP2 running as application (for testing)
This is very helpful and works, but now there seems to be a problem with the following variables:The HM-Manual wrote:In the string that represents a value of a UDV you may use the name of another macro variable(s)
udv_nofallback: (('%Status%'=='Warning') or ('%SimpleStatus%'=='UP') or (%Recurrences%<3))
udv_warnbc1: (('%SuggestedReply%'<'100') and ('%SuggestedReply%'>'10')) and (('%Status%'=='Warning') or ('%SimpleStatus%'=='UP') or (%Recurrences%<3))
udv_warnbc2: (('%SuggestedReply%'<'100') and ('%SuggestedReply%'>'10')) and %udv_nofallback%
IMHO udv_warnbc1 and udv_warnbc2 should be equal, but if you you use them in the advanced status processing dialogue
[x] use Warning status if %udv_warnbc1%
is ok, whereas
[x] use Warning status if %udv_warnbc2%
produces reply "illegal expression"
The problem seems to be the (%Recurrences%<3) as there is no error when it is replaced by another expression.
Regards
Thomas