| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
trknr
Joined: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:34 am Post subject: Linux (Redhat 9) UNC incorrect disk space result |
 |
|
Hi,
rma-unix installed my system when i asked my free disk space sytem send me an answer that is not the true result it said that i have 2 gb free space but i have 21 gb free space. what the problem might be?
Hostmonitor: 4.74 (windows 2003 server)
Redhat 9 - rma for unix
UNC test only.
Regards
Hakan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spud
Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:19 pm Post subject: UNC disk space check on FreeBSD |
|
|
I was having a similiar problem checking UNC disk space on Red Hat Linux and on FreeBSD 4.9 & FreeBSD 5.3. This newer RMA .90 fixed the problem on Linux.
Any chance of a patch that might fix the FreeBSD RMA UNC space check? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hope RMA for FreeBSD version 1 will be available tomorrow
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spud
Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:12 pm Post subject: FreeBSD problem fixed with the 1.0 RMA |
|
|
FYI, my problem was fixed with the new 1.0 agent.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good to know
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
y.beyet
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 62
Location: France
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:23 am Post subject: rma for linux ? |
|
|
It's a 0.90 version in the download page... If I download the v1.0 link... the rma file is dated from January 27, 2005 but the download link said "February 02, 2005"
Did I miss something ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | the rma file is dated from January 27, 2005 but the download link said "February 02, 2005" |
It means:
- package was built on January 27, 2005
- package was uploaded for public access on February 02, 2005.
| Quote: | | It's a 0.90 version in the download page... |
Version 0.90? What link do you use? RMA for Linux? RMA for FreeBSD? ...?
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
y.beyet
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 62
Location: France
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RMA for Linux, after upgrading, in the rma manager it's v0.90... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002
Posts: 12795
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
H'm, looks like one constant was not changed.
However it should not be a problem at all. This is really version 1.00
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
y.beyet
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 62
Location: France
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank You ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in
