I am trying to evaluate HostMonitor vs SiteScope from the functionality perspective. If anyone has an experience with both products I'd appreciate if you'd post your pros and cons for each of them in this topic. What HostMonitor can do and SiteScope can not, and vice versa? What tasks related to monitoring are easier to perform with HostMonitor vs SiteScope, and vice versa? Etc, etc...
Thanks,
Alex.
PS. I myself like HostMonitor a lot but I have to prove that it's better than SiteScope to my boss.
HostMonitor 6.10 vs SiteScope 8.x
-
- Posts: 2832
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 4:41 am
- Contact:
1. HostMonitor is much cheaper
2. HostMonitor has more features
3. HostMonitor is more flexible
4. More test methods
5. More alert methods
6. Possibility to control HostMonitor remotely using telnet client, web interface, RCC
7. Auxiliary applications like LogAnalyzer, HML Manager, Replicator, MIB Browser, WMI explorer
8. Remote Monitoring Agents for Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris
9. Fantastic support team
10. Live online forum
11. IP-Tools bonus license
12. Flexible license politics
13. HostMonitor doesn't need so much ressources and is very professional tool
14. It's possible to post on the "Wish List".
.....
Regards,
Max
2. HostMonitor has more features
3. HostMonitor is more flexible
4. More test methods
5. More alert methods
6. Possibility to control HostMonitor remotely using telnet client, web interface, RCC
7. Auxiliary applications like LogAnalyzer, HML Manager, Replicator, MIB Browser, WMI explorer
8. Remote Monitoring Agents for Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris
9. Fantastic support team
10. Live online forum
11. IP-Tools bonus license
12. Flexible license politics
13. HostMonitor doesn't need so much ressources and is very professional tool
14. It's possible to post on the "Wish List".
.....
Regards,
Max
-
- Posts: 2832
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 4:41 am
- Contact: