View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
johnm
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Posts: 117
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Alex, don't have a vote preference for any of the items listed, but extremely happy to learn that development will continue and HM will live on.
If I had to vote for one thing, it would be for a much improved WEB interface as well as an Android RCC app as commented by others in this thread.
We are long time users (10+ years) and love this great product. When someone pokes a stick at HM for it's lack of state of the art UI, the best response is: How's that $olarwinds "breach" working out for ya? There is definitely something to be said for being the somewhat obscure yet feature-packed solution out there today! ;)
Best Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12649 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you.
Improved Web interface - allow to modify tests, create tests and folders? Move tests and folders? New kind of dashboards?
Regards
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
serverteam
Joined: 28 Jun 2010 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:51 am Post subject: Suggestions |
|
|
1. HTTP test does more than URL test, but doesn't support HTTPS. HTTP sites are nearly extinct. Combine HTTP and URL tests into one test that does everything.
2. When "check contents" of URL test, allow regular expressions
3. SSO via kerberos
4. Use modern font and icons throughout |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12649 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, we plan to improve URL test.
Interface - yes, there are such tasks in the list.
SSO via kerberos?
Such option supported by RCC and Web Service logins.
Kerberos for RMA?
Regards
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12649 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do you need "check header" option?
Do you really need regular expressions for URL test?
We plan to add simple JSON processing, we think it would be much more useful
Regards
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eddymicro
Joined: 13 Nov 2002 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alex Great to hear about your plans!
My votes are for the following:
Azure platform covered by Hostmonitor
Sonicwall tests
IPMI Tests
RCC Android
Improved Web Interface - I would really prefer a more functional web interface so that we would not need to use RCC.
I might add a few more after some additional thought |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12649 Location: USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eddymicro
Joined: 13 Nov 2002 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2022 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alex,
I am going to discuss this with my staff and get back to you in a couple of days. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12649 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2022 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like SonicWall devices do provide much information over SNMP protocol. We added just CPU Usage and Memory tests in new version (probably will be released next week)
Regards
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|