Method: SNMP Trap - How to set such a test to OK manually

All questions related to installations, configurations and maintenance of Advanced Host Monitor (including additional tools such as RMA for Windows, RMA Manager, Web Servie, RCC).
JuergenF
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia

Method: SNMP Trap - How to set such a test to OK manually

Post by JuergenF »

I need a bit of help.

I have set up a "SNMP Trap" test to be set to BAD when a "Cold Start" was performed.
I think it's not a good idea to implement a "Good Filter" condition to set that test back to OK without having really seen that error.
EDIT: i.e. after an amount of time

Therefore I'd like to set that "SNMP Trap" test back to OK manually after someone has seen and recognized that BAD condition.
But I can't find an easy and good way. (Web-Interface preferred)

Any ideas are welcome

Many thanks in advance

Juergen
Last edited by JuergenF on Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:34 am, edited 3 times in total.
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

HostMonitor does not provide manual option to change test status for SNMP or any other test method. This is against HM design.
On the other hand you may use different SNMP Trap message to change status of the test back to "Ok". Such message can be send by 3rd party software or by HostMonitor itself (if you configure SNMP Trap alert and assign it to some auxiliary test method).

Regards
Alex
JuergenF
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia

Post by JuergenF »

Dear Alex,

as you write in the help file
This test method is different from any other. Unlike rest of tests that really test some devices (by sending request and receiving response), SNMP Trap test method was implemented as listener - it does not send any requests.
this method is different.

Can you think about creating an enhancement for the GOOD-Filter section:
- Set Test to OK, when (manually) acknowledged

From my point of view that sounds easier than setting up a pseudo test for sending a pseudo trap to set the SNMP Trap test to OK.

What do others think who use this method for Traps that are not reset from the device itself (Link-up / Link-down is very easy. But what about warm start / cold start / authentication failure / fan-errors / Power-supply errors / temperature problems. From my point of view all these failures will not send a "GOOD" Trap, when the problem is fixed)

May we discuss that in the Wish-List forum ?

Many thanks

Juergen
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

I think we can implement such option

Regards
Alex
JuergenF
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia

Post by JuergenF »

JuergenF wrote:Can you think about creating an enhancement for the GOOD-Filter section:
- Set Test to OK, when (manually) acknowledged
KS-Soft wrote:I think we can implement such option
Great !

Many thanks

Juergen
AntonyP
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:40 am
Location: Athens Greece

Post by AntonyP »

I am also interested in this feature request :wink:

Thanks!
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

Update available at www.ks-soft.net/download/hm625.zip
Please install version 6.24 before using this update

Regards
Alex
JuergenF
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia

Post by JuergenF »

KS-Soft wrote:Update available at www.ks-soft.net/download/hm625.zip
Please install version 6.24 before using this update

Regards
Alex
Many thanks - works fine :D
AntonyP
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:40 am
Location: Athens Greece

Post by AntonyP »

I installed the update, but i think i am doing something wrong. The set-ack-and-ok function does not set the trap alarm back to green.
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

So, what exactly are you doing? You are using version 6.24 or 6.25? You are selecting SNMP Trap test method for ACK operation or you selecting several different test items?

Regards
Alex
thomasschmeidl
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:14 pm
Location: Germany, Bavaria

Post by thomasschmeidl »

Hi Alex,

I just installed the 6.25. This feature is very helpful for us!

May I refer to http://www.ks-soft.net/cgi-bin/phpBB/vi ... ght=#12942 with two questions about SNMP Trap tests:

1. Why can't SNMP Trap tests be dependent on other tests?

2. Do you think you can implement the "escalation by counting the number of time intervals having passed by since the test went bad", too? Your "Yeah, may be we can implement this...." was very promising.

Kind regards

Thomas
AntonyP
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:40 am
Location: Athens Greece

Post by AntonyP »

KS-Soft wrote:So, what exactly are you doing? You are using version 6.24 or 6.25? You are selecting SNMP Trap test method for ACK operation or you selecting several different test items?

Regards
Alex
When the trap test goes off (red), i use RCC to ack it but it does not go back to green.
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

When the trap test goes off (red), i use RCC to ack it but it does not go back to green
We still cannot reproduce the problem
1) Could you please answer all my questions? Not just 1st one?
2) Have you set "Good message filter" to "Set Ok status by acknowledgement"?

Regards
Alex
KS-Soft
Posts: 13012
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by KS-Soft »

1. Why can't SNMP Trap tests be dependent on other tests?
There are several reasons
1) technical: HostMonitor uses completely different code to manage SNMP Trap test items, it doesn't work like other tests
2) logical: HostMonitor cannot recheck device when Master test changes status. Especially when single SNMP Trap test may receive messages from many devices
3) may be there are some other reasons, I just do not remember
May be we can find some workaround for the problems, but I don't think this is high priority task.
2. Do you think you can implement the "escalation by counting the number of time intervals having passed by since the test went bad", too? Your "Yeah, may be we can implement this...." was very promising
This task has medium priority. And we have over 100 tasks with medium priority :roll:

Regards
Alex
AntonyP
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:40 am
Location: Athens Greece

Post by AntonyP »

KS-Soft wrote:
When the trap test goes off (red), i use RCC to ack it but it does not go back to green
We still cannot reproduce the problem
1) Could you please answer all my questions? Not just 1st one?
2) Have you set "Good message filter" to "Set Ok status by acknowledgement"?

Regards
Alex
I thought the extra "Set Ok status by acknowledgement" option would be added to the normal "Set Ok if received message satisfies ... " trap. Is there no way to have both options?
Post Reply