View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jromariz
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 264 Location: Brasil
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 8:33 am Post subject: Traffic Monitor Test Value |
|
|
Hi Alex,
I woul like to able to set values bellow 1kb/min in the traffic monitor test. I need to monitor a link which has a flow of about 0.2kb/min.
Regards,
Joćo. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
V Arun
Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alex,
I need it too !! I have an earlier request for getting values in Bits/Sec or KBits/Sec.. Now the values are in Bytes.
Regards,
Arun |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12795 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, we can add new options. But what options better?
1) bytes/sec and bytes/min
or
2) Kbits/sec and Kbits/min
I prefer second variant
Regards
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
V Arun
Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alex,
Kbits/Sec and Kbits/Min would be just perfect.
Also, maybe a paramter for Interface status ?? I have an earlier request for this too !!!
Regards,
Arun |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12795 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I implemented Kbits/Sec and Kbits/Min units.
But now I am thinking about removing... Because its new unit to display...
Oh, better I just change limit type - integer to real... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jromariz
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 264 Location: Brasil
|
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 11:07 am Post subject: Traffic Monitor Test Value |
|
|
Alex,
Is the version with Kb/min available for download?
Thanks,
Jromariz. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KS-Soft
Joined: 03 Apr 2002 Posts: 12795 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nope.
On the one hand I don't want to invent new units for Reply field. It could produce some new problems...
On the other hand convert result and display Kbyte/sec while you are checking for Kbit/sec is not correctly either.
So, probably the best solution - posibility to specify real number as limit. But this will not be implemented in "unofficial" update. It could be done in release only.
Regards
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|